< (lt) and > (gt) in tbs_check ?

i guess, that its not possbile to you "greater-than" and "lesser-than" conditions! i only can use "=" (equal) and "!=" (not-equal). and why you do not use "==" for equal like PHP?

Hi Deezatser,

Those two operators for conditional display are already in the wish list :) It's possible to have them, and it will probably be done in next version.

About "=" instead of "==", that was for simplicity, but it seems to disturbe some PHP developers.

alow both = and ==

Ok, it can be done.

But we have to replace < and > by some other characters because they make confusion with html tags.
Example :
  [var.x;if [val]>100; then 'hight']

This tag won't be seen WYSIWYG :(

Any suggestion's welcome.

what about "gt" for > and "lt" for <
also possible "eq" for = and 'ne' for !=

Symboles are better because they are not supposed to be used in a normal string.
For example: with your syntax, the expression
would be difficult to analyse.

what about :

or:

I like the +- option best of the two

Might I suggest that XSLT uses &gt; and &lt; but I don't know how that affects strings  like you said though. XSLT uses them because of the < and > problem in XML...

"&gt;" and "&lt;" are unfortunatly not welcome inside a TBS tags because ";" is the parameter separator.

what about:


examples:

a little bit strange? maybe ;-)

Everybody seems to have different opinions here:
If deezaster's system is ok, with [..] then why not have the symbols directly within [...] or (...) or {...} whichever is easiest for Skrol29:
But I thought ">" and "<" were not allowed, but could this be combined with the above suggestions of "gt" or "&gt;" etc. like this: